Un-reconciled export payments can land you on the RBI Caution List, stopping all your future shipments. We map IRMs to Shipping Bills and regularize your account.
Do you have pending Shipping Bills > 9 months?
EDPMS is the export proceeds monitoring framework used to track whether export payments are realised against shipping bills and closed correctly through the authorised dealer bank.
eBRC is the DGFT-facing proof of export realisation. If IRM mapping, shipping bill reconciliation, short realisation, or bank-side closure is incomplete, exporters can face open entries, incentive delays, and caution-list risk.
Follow-up with AD bank records, IRM mapping, and closure requirements.
Match export invoices, realisation evidence, deductions, and shipping bill data.
Reduce unresolved export bill exposure and future caution-list risk.
This page is built for exporters facing open shipping bills, pending eBRC generation, IRM mismatch, short realisation, and bank-side export closure issues.
EDPMS issues are rarely just a portal problem. They usually involve a mismatch between commercial records, shipping bills, bank remittance data, and DGFT expectations.
A clean closure path protects future shipments, supports eBRC readiness, and gives management a clear view of which export proceeds are still unresolved.
Useful where payment is received but the shipping bill still appears open, unrealised, or unmatched because the IRM was not mapped correctly.
Relevant where eBRC generation is blocked because the underlying bank-side transaction mapping is incomplete.
Applies where export proceeds were received with deductions, partial payment, bank charges, or write-off requirements.
Important for exporters who want to prevent repeat non-realisation flags and banking restrictions across multiple shipments.
A practical workflow for identifying the issue and moving it toward closure.
We identify whether the case is an IRM-mapping issue, partial-remittance issue, short-realisation problem, delayed closure case, or wider export-compliance risk.
Shipping bill, inward remittance, invoice value, deductions, and bank-side records are reviewed together before follow-up starts.
We define whether the matter needs bank-side mapping, object-code correction, short-realisation reasoning, extension, write-off, or updated closure handling.
Where relevant, we review how EDPMS closure affects eBRC availability and export incentive workflows tied to proof of realisation.
The aim is not only to close current open entries but also to improve document flow and bank coordination for future exports.
Payment received but shipping bill still shows open.
IRM exists but is not mapped with the correct shipping bill.
eBRC is expected but bank records are not transaction-ready.
Short realisation, bank charges, or deductions are not documented properly.
Old open export bills have accumulated across many shipments.
Primary ecosystem reference for banking and export proceeds monitoring.
Useful for DGFT-linked eBRC and export benefit workflows.
Relevant for shipping bill and customs-side export record references.
Related internal resources: review IGST refund support, RoDTEP scheme support, and GST LUT filing for stronger export compliance continuity.
EDPMS closure is a banking, export-document, and compliance exercise. CloudDesk helps structure the file before follow-up.
We identify the exact reason an export entry is unresolved, instead of treating every case as the same bank follow-up.
We review the transaction trail so realisation evidence can be matched with the correct export records.
Delayed or partly realised proceeds need correct reasoning, documentation, and bank-side treatment.
We help prepare a cleaner follow-up path so the bank has the right information to act on the case.
Consultancy & Filing
Based on License Value
Per Document Basis
Per Shipping Bill Closure
*Volume discounts available for >50 shipping bills.
EDPMS is the export monitoring framework used to track whether export proceeds are realised against shipping bills within the permitted timeline and closed correctly.
EDPMS is the monitoring and closure framework for export realisation. eBRC is the DGFT-facing proof of export proceeds realisation.
Common reasons include missing IRM mapping, bank-side non-updation, deduction handling issues, short-realisation mismatch, or incomplete transaction closure.
Yes. If export proceeds are not reflected properly, eBRC-dependent workflows and export benefit documentation can be affected.
Often yes, but the case usually needs correct reasoning, supporting records, and AD bank-side treatment for short realisation, bank charges, or approved adjustment logic.
Extension is relevant when proceeds are delayed but expected. Write-off is relevant when part or all of the export receivable will not be realised and needs compliant banking treatment.